Review article | Open Access
Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education 2025, Vol. 6(2) 117-128
Quality and quality assurance in teacher professional development: A comparative study
pp. 117 - 128 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/jirte.2025.1341.6
Publish Date: September 22, 2025 | Single/Total View: 0/0 | Single/Total Download: 0/0
Abstract
This study examines teacher professional development processes from the perspectives of quality and quality assurance in Finland, the United States, Japan, and Germany. Adopting a qualitative approach, the research utilized the document analysis method. The data were sourced from national laws and regulations, policy documents, reports from international organizations, and peer-reviewed academic articles on teacher professional development and quality assurance published between 2004 and 2025. The analysis was conducted across three main dimensions: policy orientations, implementation mechanisms, and quality assurance tools. The findings indicate that Japan's emphasis on lifelong professional development and lesson study practices has fostered a strong professional learning culture. The U.S. demonstrates a multi-actor quality assurance system supported by standards, certification, and accreditation processes. Germany's federal structure relies on a cyclical quality management approach. In Finland, teacher autonomy and research-based teacher education are highlighted. The comparative analysis reveals similarities and differences in how these countries integrate teacher professional development with quality assurance. The findings reveal a range of balances between centralization and autonomy, supervision and guidance, and individual and collective learning. The study emphasizes that effective quality assurance mechanisms are critical in enhancing educational quality. Based on these findings, it is recommended that Turkey's policymakers strengthen quality assurance mechanisms in teacher professional development, expand practice-oriented training, and establish a flexible system responsive to local needs. It would be particularly beneficial for Turkey to examine and integrate approaches such as mentoring, peer learning, and performance-based feedback, as seen in these international examples.
Keywords: teacher professional development, quality assurance, standards and accreditation, professional autonomy, comparative education
APA 7th edition
Arslan, M. (2025). Quality and quality assurance in teacher professional development: A comparative study. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 6(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.29329/jirte.2025.1341.6
Harvard
Arslan, M. (2025). Quality and quality assurance in teacher professional development: A comparative study. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 6(2), pp. 117-128.
Chicago 16th edition
Arslan, Mehmet (2025). "Quality and quality assurance in teacher professional development: A comparative study". Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education 6 (2):117-128. https://doi.org/10.29329/jirte.2025.1341.6
AIR. (2020). Annual report on education research and development. American Institutes for Research.
Akiba, M., & Liang, G. (2016). Effects of teacher professional learning activities on student achievement growth. Journal of Educational Research, 109(1), 99–110.
Altrichter, H., & Eder, F. (2004). School evaluation and teacher education in Austria and Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976042000223013
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over the past ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Company.
BMBF. (2023). Bildung und Forschung in Zahlen 2023. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. https://www.bmbf.de
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
CAEP. (2023). Accreditation standards. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. https://caepnet.org
CCSSO. (2011). InTASC model core teaching standards: A resource for state dialogue. Council of Chief State School Officers.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument. Princeton, NJ: The Danielson Group.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Hyler, M. E. (2020). Preparing educators for the time of COVID and beyond. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1816961
Darling-Hammond, L., & Rothman, R. (2015). Teaching in the flat world: Learning from high-performing systems. Teachers College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
ETS. (2023). Praxis tests: Information about state testing requirements. Educational Testing Service.
European Commission. (2020). Supporting teacher educators for better learning outcomes. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission/Eurydice. (2020). Teachers in Europe: Careers, development and well-being. Luxembourg: Publications Office.
Eurydice. (2025, March 17). Quality assurance in Finland. Eurydice – European Commission. https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu
Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393–405.
FINEEC. (2025). Finnish Education Evaluation Centre. https://karvi.fi/en/
Fujii, T. (2014). Implementing Japanese Lesson Study in foreign countries: Misconceptions revealed. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 65–83.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
GEW (Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft). (2020). Bildungsqualität und Lehrerfortbildung in Deutschland. GEW. https://www.gew.de
Grek, S., Lawn, M., Ozga, J., & Segerholm, C. (2013). Governing by inspection? European inspectorates and the creation of a European education policy space. Comparative Education, 49(4), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.770944
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
Hill, H. C., Beisiegel, M., & Jacob, R. (2013). Professional development research: Consensus, crossroads, and challenges. Educational Researcher, 42(9), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13512674
Hofer, S. I., Holzberger, D., & Reiss, K. (2020). Evaluating school inspection effectiveness: A systematic review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, 100861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100861
IQB. (2021). Bildungstrends im Ländervergleich. Institut zur Qualitätsentwicklung im Bildungswesen.
Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (Eds.). (2006). Research-based teacher education in Finland – Reflections by Finnish teacher educators. Finnish Educational Research Association.
Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
KMK. (2004). Standards für die Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaften. Kultusministerkonferenz.
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK). (2004). Standards für die Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaften. Bonn: KMK. https://www.kmk.org
Louws, M. L., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K., & van Driel, J. H. (2017). Teachers’ self-directed learning and teaching experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.014
NBPTS. (2024). National Board certification. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. https://www.nbpts.org
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Niemi, H. (2015). Teacher professional development in Finland: Towards a more holistic approach. Psychology, Society & Education, 7(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.520
Niemi, H., Toom, A., & Kallioniemi, A. (Eds.). (2016). Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41267-2
OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). Education policy outlook: Japan. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2020). Teachers and school leaders are lifelong learners. In TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
OECD. (2021). Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners: TALIS 2018 results (Vol. II). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ono, Y., & Ferreira, J. (2010). A case study of continuing teacher professional development through lesson study in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 30(1), 59–74.
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
RAND Corporation. (2012). Teachers matter: Understanding teachers’ impact on student achievement. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Sahlberg, P. (2010). The secret to Finland’s success: Educating teachers. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/library/publications/232
Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y
Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
Saito, E., & Atencio, M. (2015). Lesson study for learning community (LSLC): Conceptualising teachers’ practices within a social justice perspective. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(6), 795–807.
Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Stensaker, B. (2008). Outcomes of quality assurance: A discussion of knowledge, methodology and validity. Quality in Higher Education, 14(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320802011574
Takahashi, A., & McDougal, T. (2016). Collaborative lesson research: Maximizing the impact of lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 513–526.
TALIS 2018. (n.d.). Teachers and teaching conditions in Finland. OECD. (Eğitim GPS)
Tarhan, H., Karaman, A., Kemppinen, L., & Aerila, J. (2019). Understanding teacher evaluation in Finland: A professional development framework. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2019v44n4.1
Terhart, E. (2011). Teacher professional development in Germany: State of the art. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 57(4), 524–540.
Tikly, L., & Barrett, A. M. (2011). Social justice, capabilities and the quality of education in low income countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.06.001
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2023). Öğretmenlik Mesleği Kanunu [Resmî Gazete, 14.02.2023]. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2024). Millî Eğitim Akademisi Yönetmeliği. https://www.meb.gov.tr
U.S. Department of Education. (2024). Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) implementation report. Washington, DC: USDoE.
UNESCO. (2005). EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005: The quality imperative. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO/Teacher Task Force. (2019). Teacher policy development guide. Paris: UNESCO.
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.001
Yoshida, M. (2012). Exploring ideas for a mathematics teacher educator’s contribution to lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(2), 157–171.
Zeichner, K. (2010). Competition, economic rationalization, increased surveillance, and attacks on diversity: Neo-liberalism and the transformation of teacher education in the US. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1544–1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.004
