Original article | Open Access
Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education 2024, Vol. 5(2) 94-110
pp. 94 - 110 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/jirte.2024.667.1
Publish Date: September 19, 2024 | Number of Views: 107 | Number of Download: 126
Abstract
This research aims to systematically review the distributed leadership studies with phenomenological designs in educational contexts to investigate their descriptive indicators, the characteristics of phenomenological research designs, their research focus, and outcomes. A systematic review approach was employed in this study to identify, evaluate, and summarize research evidence within the scope of the research questions. Of 39 publications extracted from Web of Science, Scopus, and Educational Resources Information Center, nine documents were included in the review upon implementing the inclusion and exclusion criteria. According to the results, the studies ranged from 2011 to 2024, and the majority were conducted in Turkey and the USA at the K-12 level in separate or combined designs. Regarding phenomenological design, the studies varied in treating phenomenology and reflecting diverse perspectives. For instance, a notable number of studies utilized the purposive sampling method to select participants. However, most of them differed in their analysis techniques. As for their research focus and outcomes, it was detected that the eligible studies generally focused on influencing factors, elements, and experiences about distributed leadership, and significant results were revealed through phenomenological lenses.
Keywords: Phenomenology, Distributed leadership, Educational research, Qualitative methodology
APA 7th edition
Kirisci-Sarikaya, A., & Fayda-Kinik, F.S. (2024). Phenomenological approach to distributed leadership in educational research: A systematic review. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 5(2), 94-110. https://doi.org/10.29329/jirte.2024.667.1
Harvard
Kirisci-Sarikaya, A. and Fayda-Kinik, F. (2024). Phenomenological approach to distributed leadership in educational research: A systematic review. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 5(2), pp. 94-110.
Chicago 16th edition
Kirisci-Sarikaya, Aylin and F. Sehkar Fayda-Kinik (2024). "Phenomenological approach to distributed leadership in educational research: A systematic review". Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education 5 (2):94-110. https://doi.org/10.29329/jirte.2024.667.1
Ahumada, L., Maureira, O., & Castro, S. (2019). Strengthening distributed leadership in schools through collaborative research. Profesorado, 23(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v23i2.9252
Altunay, E., & Erol, E. (2023). School leadership during and post-COVID-19 in the context of school repositioning. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 13(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.1109319
Anderson, J., & Eppard, J. (1998). Van Kaam’s method revisited. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 399–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800310
Avissar, I., Alkaher, I., & Gan, D. (2018). The role of distributed leadership in mainstreaming environmental sustainability into campus life in an Israeli teaching college: A case study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(3), 518–546. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2017-0105
Boru, N. (2020). Organizational and environmental contexts affecting school principals’ distributed leadership practices. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 8(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2020.4482
Cudjoe, E. (2023). Making sense of Husserlian phenomenological philosophy in empirical research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231171099
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.) Sage Publications.
Eryilmaz, N., & Sandoval-Hernandez, A. (2023). Is distributed leadership universal? A cross-cultural, comparative approach across 40 countries: An alignment optimisation approach. Education Sciences, 13(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020218
Errasti‐Ibarrondo, B., Jordán, J. A., Díez‐Del‐Corral, M. P., & Arantzamendi, M. (2018). Conducting phenomenological research: Rationalizing the methods and rigour of the phenomenology of practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(7), 1723–1734. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13569
Eslava-Zapata, R., Omaña Guerrero, J. A., Sierra Narváez, F. J., & Mogrovejo Andrade, J. M. (2023). Leadership styles: A study in Latin America, the United States and Europe. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia, 3. https://doi.org/10.56294/SALUDCYT2023401
Falkenthal, E., & Byrne, A. M. (2021). Distributed leadership in collegiate esports. Simulation and Gaming, 52(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120958750
Farrell, E. (2020). Researching lived experience in education: Misunderstood or missed opportunity? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920942066
Feijoo, A. M. L. C. D. (2023). Phenomenological-hermeneutic method: From research in philosophy to psychology research. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 33, e3337. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3337
Gaus, N., Basri, M., Thamrin, H., & Ritonga, F. U. (2022). Understanding the nature and practice of leadership in higher education: A phenomenological approach. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(5), 685–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1737241
Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28(2), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916297X00103
Giorgi, A. (2010). Phenomenology and the practice of science. Existential Analysis: Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis, 21(1), 3–22. https://community.existentialanalysis.org.uk/product/existential-analysis-vol-21-1-january-2010-pdf
Giorgi, A., & Giorgi, B. (2003). Phenomenology. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 25–50). Sage Publications.
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood, P. Hallinger, G. C. Furman, K. Riley, J. MacBeath, P. Gronn, & B. Mulford (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 653–696). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9_23
Gustafsson, L. (2020). Systematic reviews, scholarly discussion and opportunities [Editorial]. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 67(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12658
Hairon, S., & Goh, J. W. (2015). Pursuing the elusive construct of distributed leadership: Is the search over? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(5), 693–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535745
Harris, A. (2009). Distributed leadership: What we know. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives (pp. 11–21). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9_2
Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635
Harris, A., Jones, M., & Ismail, N. (2022). Distributed leadership: Taking a retrospective and contemporary view of the evidence base. School Leadership and Management, 42(5), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2109620
Horrigan-Kelly, M., Millar, M., & Dowling, M. (2016). Understanding the key tenets of Heidegger’s philosophy for interpretive phenomenological research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406916680634
Jakobsen, M. L., Kjeldsen, A. M., & Pallesen, T. (2023). Distributed leadership and performance-related employee outcomes in public sector organizations. Public Administration, 101(2), 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12801
Kafle, N. P. (2013). Lived experiences of middle level leaders in the Nepali institutional schools. Journal of Education and Research, 3(2) 59–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jer.v3i2.8398
Klein, E. J., Taylor, M., Munakata, M., Trabona, K., Rahman, Z., & McManus, J. (2018). Navigating teacher leaders’ complex relationships using a distributed leadership framework. Teacher Education Quarterly, 45(2), 89–112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90020316
Ku Leuven Institute of Philosophy. (2024). Introduction to Phenomenology. Retrieved June 11, 2024, from https://hiw.kuleuven.be/en/study/prospective/OOCP/introduction-to-phenomenology
Lee, H.-Y. (2021). Qualitative content analysis: The significance of distributed leadership and its role in education. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(9), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.9.202109.65
Mercado, M. M. (2024). Distributed leadership in educational training: Educational leadership. In E. Cardoso Espinosa (Ed.), Promoting quality hybrid learning through leadership and educational management (pp. 25–55). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0094-7.ch002
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.
Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C.T. & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
Padilla-Díaz, M. (2015). Phenomenology in educational qualitative research: Philosophy as science or philosophical science. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 1(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.18562/ijee.2015.0009
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Patton, C. M., & Broward, J. (2023). The giants and forerunners of phenomenology: Husserl, Heidegger, and their predecessors. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(4), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13600
Peca, K. (2001). Paradigmatic differences in educational administration: Positivism and critical theory. Information Analyses, 70, 1–59. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED458706.pdf
Polat, M. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ multidimensional leadership orientations: A PLS-SEM modelling. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 4(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.29329/jirte.2023.531.8
Postholm, M. B. (2011). A completed research and development work project in school: The teachers’ learning and possibilities, premises and challenges for further development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.10.010
Racher, F. E., & Robinson, S. (2003). Are phenomenology and postpositivism strange bedfellows? Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945903253909
Reiners, G. M. (2012). Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger’s (interpretive) phenomenological research. Journal of Nursing & Care, 1(5), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1168.1000119
Ruiz Salazar, J. M., Huaita Acha, D. M., Vásquez Tomás, M. R., & Holguin-Alvarez, J. (2022). Perception of distributed leadership in Peruvian education. Venezuelan Journal of Management, 27(7), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.27.7.17
Salifu, I. (2021). Exploring coteaching as a trend in higher education. College Teaching, 69(3), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1838426
Seidman I. E. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide to researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Schmid, C. H., White, I. R., & Stijnen, T. (2020). Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis. In C. H. Schmid, T. Stijnen, & I. R. White, I. R. (Eds), Handbook of meta-analysis (pp. 1–18). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315119403-1
Shaheen, N., Shaheen, A., Ramadan, A., Hefnawy, M. T., Ramadan, A., Ibrahim, I. A., Elsayed Hassanein, M., Ashour, M. E., & Flouty, O. (2023). Appraising systematic reviews: A comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 8, 1268045. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1268045
Shal, T., Ghamrawi, N., Abu-Tineh, A., Al-Shaboul, Y. M., & Sellami, A. (2024). Teacher leadership and virtual communities: Unpacking teacher agency and distributed leadership. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12446-5
Tan, C. (2023). Distributed leadership and Sunzi’s art of warfare. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2023.2298688
Turk, N. (2021). Methodology of systematic reviews. Slovenian Medical Journal, 90(7–8), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.6016/ZdravVestn.3138
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Routledge.
Van Kaam, A. L. (1959). Phenomenal analysis: Exemplified by a study of the experience of “really feeling understood.” Journal of Individual Psychology, 15(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2022.20220135.en