Aivelo, T., & Uitto, A. (2019). Teachers’ choice of content and consideration of controversial and sensitive issues in teaching of secondary school genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2716–2735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1694195

Arslan, H., Yazıcı, S., Çetin, E., Dil, K., & Çakır, F. S. (2023). Political media use, civic knowledge, civic self-efficacy, and gender: measuring active citizenship in Turkey. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02281-x

Avery, P. G., Levy, S. A., & Simmons, A. M. M. (2013). Deliberating controversial public issues as part of civic education. The Social Studies, 104(3), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2012.691571

Borgerding, L. A., & Dagistan, M. (2018). Preservice science teachers’ concerns and approaches for teaching socioscientific and controversial issues. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(4), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2018.1440860

Cebesoy, U. B., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2021). Embracing socioscientific issues-based teaching and decision-making in teacher professional development. Educational Review, 75(3), 507–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1931037

Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377

Chikoko, V., Gilmour, J. D., Harber, C., & Serf, J. (2011). Teaching controversial issues and teacher education in England and South Africa. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.538268

Christenson, N., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2015). A framework for teachers’ assessment of socio-scientific argumentation: An example using the GMO issue. Journal of Biological Education, 49(2), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.923486

Christenson, N., Chang Rundgren, S. N., & Zeidler, D. L. (2014). The relationship of discipline background to upper secondary students’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 44, 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9394-6

Christenson, N., Gericke, N., & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2017). Science and language teachers’ assessment of upper secondary students’ socioscientific argumentation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 1403–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9746-6

Cotton, D. R. E. (2006). Teaching controversial environmental issues: neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom. Educational Research, 48(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880600732306

Day, S. P., & Bryce, T. G. K. (2010). Does the discussion of socioscientific issues require a paradigm shift in science teachers' thinking? International Journal of Science Education, 33(12), 1675–1702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.519804

Dearden, R. F. (1981, January). Controversial issues and the curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027810130105

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Echchakoui, S. (2020). Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: The case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9

Ekström, M., & Östman, J. (2013). Family talk, peer talk and young people's civic orientation. European Journal of Communication, 28(3), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113475410

Erlich, R. R., & Gindi, S. (2018). Are civics teachers different from teachers of other disciplines in their handling of controversial issues? Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 14(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197918767082

Ersoy, A. F. (2010). Social studies teacher candidates' views on the controversial issues incorporated into their courses in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.015

Ersoy, A. F. (2010). Social studies teacher candidates’ views on the controversial issues incorporated into their courses in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education 26, 323–334.

Flensner, K. K. (2020). Teaching controversial issues in diverse religious education classrooms. Religions, 11(9), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11090465

Friedrichsen, P. J., Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., & Zangori, L. (2021). Enacting co-designed socio-scientific issues-based curriculum units: A case of secondary science teacher learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1795576

Gardner, G., & Jones, G. (2010). Perceptions and Practices: Biology graduate teaching assistants’ framing of a controversial socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1031–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003743244

Gayford, C. (2002). Controversial environmental issues: A case study for the professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1191–1200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134866

Greene, J. A., & Yu, S. B. (2016). Educating critical thinkers: The role of epistemic cognition. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215622223

Guilford, C. C. (1941). Presenting Controversial Issues. The Social Studies, 32(5), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1936.11016604

Hand, M., & Levinson, R. (2012). Discussing controversial issues in the classroom. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(6), 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00732.x

Hess, D. E., & McAvoy, P. (2015). The Political Classroom. Routledge.

Ho, L. C., & Seow, T. (2015). Teaching controversial issues in geography: Climate change education in Singaporean schools. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(3), 314–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1064842

Hou, L., Pan, Y., & Zhu, J. J. (2021). Impact of scientific, economic, geopolitical, and cultural factors on international research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 15(3), 101194 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101194

https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x09333960

Jerome, L., & Elwick, A. (2019). Teaching about terrorism, extremism and radicalization: some implications for controversial issues pedagogy. Oxford Review of Education, 46(2), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1667318

Kauppi, V. M., & Drerup, J. (2021). Discussion and inquiry: A Deweyan perspective on teaching controversial issues. Theory and Research in Education, 19(3), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785211052199

Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues. Science & Education, 30(3), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1

Kerr, D., Europe, C. O., & Huddleston, T. (2021). Learning How to Handle Controversial Issues in Schools and Other Education Settings, https://rm.coe.int/learning-how-to-handle-controversial-issues-in-schools-and-other-educa/1680a12734

Khishfe, R., Alshaya, F. S., BouJaoude, S., Mansour, N., & Alrudiyan, K. I. (2017). Students' understandings of nature of science and their arguments in the context of four socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 299–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1280741

Klofstad, C. A. (2009). Civic Talk and Civic Participation: The Moderating Effect of Individual Predispositions. American Politics Research, 37(5), 856–878. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X09333960

Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011

Koseoglu, M. A., Rahimi, R., Okumus, F., & Liu, J. (2016). Bibliometric studies in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 61, 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2016.10.006

Kraatz, E., von Spiegel, J., Sayers, R., & Brady, A. C. (2022). Should we “just stick to the facts”? The benefit of controversial conversations in classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 61(3), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2096381

Massarani, L., Castelfranchi, Y., Mendes, I., Fagundes, V. O., & Moreira, I. (2021). Science in society: What young Brazilians think about S&T. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciências, 93(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120200204

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2015, October 19). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042

National Science Board (2008). Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. NSB 08-01 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499644.pdf#page=5.12

National Science Board (2021). Publications Output: U.S. Trends and International Comparisons. NSB-2021-4 October 28, 2021, https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221/

NCSS [National Council for the Social Studies], (2007). Academic freedom and the social studies educator. Social Education 80(3), 186-186, https://www.socialstudies.org/system/files/publications/articles/se_800316186.pdf

Öntaş, T., Yıldırım, E., Egüz, Ş., & Kaya, B. (2021). Reflections of Teaching of Controversial Topics to the Field of Classroom Education. Education and Science, 46(205), 161-189. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.9104

Oulton, C., Day, V., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Controversial issues‐teachers' attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000303973

Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students' argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International journal of science education, 21(7), 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290408

Payne, B. K., & Gainey, R. R. (2003). Understanding and developing controversial issues in college courses. College Teaching, 51(2), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550309596412

Scimago (2024). Country ranking. https://www.scimagojr.com/index.php

Sharp, K. A. (2006). An historical analysis of the presentation of controversial issues in journals published by The National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS): 1973 – 2003, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Stradling, R. (1984). Controversial issues in the curriculum. In R. Stradling, M. Noctor, & B. Baines (Eds.), Teaching controversial issues. (pp. 1–12). Edward Arnold.

Tribukait, M. (2021). Students’ prejudice as a teaching challenge: How European history educators deal with controversial and sensitive issues in a climate of political polarization. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(4), 540–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.1947426

Wahl, A. M., Perez, E. T., Deegan, M. J., Sanchez, T. W., & Applegate, C. (2000). The controversial classroom: Institutional resources and pedagogical strategies for a race relations course. Teaching Sociology, 28(4), 316. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318582

Wang, W., & Lu, C. (2020). Visualization analysis of big data research based on Citespace. Soft Computing, 24(11), 8173–8186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04384-7

Wellington, J. J. (ed) (1986). Controversial Issues in the Curriculum, Blackwell.

Yacek, D. (2018). Thinking controversially: The psychological condition for teaching controversial issues. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 52(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12282

Zangori, L., Peel, A., Kinslow, A., Friedrichsen, P., & Sadler, T. D. (2017). Student development of model‐based reasoning about carbon cycling and climate change in a socio‐scientific issues unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21404

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629