Research article    |    Open Access
Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education 2025, Vol. 6(1) 36-54

More from an instrumentalist perspective: examining digital games from an instrumental rationality perspective

Veysel Bilal Arslankara

pp. 36 - 54

Publish Date: March 26, 2025  |   Single/Total View: 14/13   |   Single/Total Download: 27/18


Abstract

Although digital games are used for entertainment and educational purposes, the characters and designs often influence players’ behaviors and thought processes. The concept of the pedagogical agent in digital games allows for an analysis of game characters’ roles. However, in some games, these characters may create adverse effects by promoting harmful behaviors rather than fostering positive learning experiences. The instrumental rationality approach seeks to explain this situation and suggests that moral values or ethical concerns can be disregarded when pursuing success. This research aims to examine the characteristics of the characters in popular ten games (Fortnite, Brawl Stars, Call of Duty (CoD), Clash of Clans, League of Legends (LoL), Minecraft, Overwatch, PUBG (Player Unknown’s Battlegrounds), Roblox, Valorant) from the perspective of instrumental rationality and to analyze how these characters function as pedagogical agents. The study evaluates whether the values presented to players by these in-game characters lack ethical and moral considerations. The research was conducted as a qualitative document analysis study. In this context, the characteristics of the characters displayed on the official games’ websites were analyzed using the content analysis method. The study assessed how these characters were structured as pedagogical agents and their potential adverse effects on players. By employing content analysis, the focus was placed on how the characters’ features were reflected to players and whether these features pursued an educational purpose. The study’s findings reveal that the characters in these games function as pedagogical agents, but these agents negatively affect players. The instrumental rationality perspective exposes how these characters are designed solely to achieve goals while disregarding factors such as ethics and values. This study demonstrates that the characters in digital games serve entertainment purposes and play a more profound educational role, which can have negative impacts.

Keywords: Instrumental rationality, digital games, game characters


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Arslankara, V.B. (2025). More from an instrumentalist perspective: examining digital games from an instrumental rationality perspective. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 6(1), 36-54.

Harvard
Arslankara, V. (2025). More from an instrumentalist perspective: examining digital games from an instrumental rationality perspective. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 6(1), pp. 36-54.

Chicago 16th edition
Arslankara, Veysel Bilal (2025). "More from an instrumentalist perspective: examining digital games from an instrumental rationality perspective". Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education 6 (1):36-54.

References

    Aksoy, N., & Usta, E. (2023). Student, teacher, and parent opinions on gamification components used in educational information network (EBA). Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 4(2), 263-281. https://doi.org/10.29329/jirte.2023.572.6

    Apperley, T. H. (2006). Genre and game studies: Toward a critical approach to video game genres. Simulation & Gaming, 37(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878105282278

    Ardıç, A., & Irmak, A. Y. (2018). Dijital oyunların çocuk ve ergenler üzerindeki etkileri: Literatür inceleme [The effects of digital games on children and adolescents: A literature review]. Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(16), 71-94.

    Arslan, K., & Coştu, F. (2022). Eğitimin vazgeçilmez parçası dijital oyunlar: lisansüstü tezlere ait bir sentez çalışması [Digital games as an indispensable part of education: a synthesis study of postgraduate theses]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (54), 1329-1359. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1169883

    Arslankara, V. B., & Usta, E. (2019). Lise öğrencilerinin sanal ortamlardaki güven durumları ile sanal yalnızlıklarının sanal risk algısı bağlamında incelenmesi [The analysis of high school students’ confidence situations in virtual environments and their virtual loneliness in the context of virtual risk perception]. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5, 288-301.

    Arslankara, V. B., & Usta, E. (2020). Lise öğrencilerinde sanal risk algısı: Problemli internet kullanımı ve eleştirel düşünme bağlamında bir araştırma [Perception of virtual risks in high school students: A study in the context of problematic internet use and critical thinking]. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 134-153.

    Arslankara, V. B., & Usta, E. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence as a lifelong learning self efficacy: usage and competence scale. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 6(2), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1489304

    Arslankara, V. B., Demir, A., Oztas, O., Usta, E. (2022). Digital well-being scale validity and reliability study. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 4(2), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1206193

    Aydemir, M., & Fetah, V. (2022). Dijital oyun ortamında nft kullanımı ve oyna-kazan modelinin yapısal analizi [The use of NFT in digital game environment and structural analysis of play-win model]. TRT Akademi, 7(16), 970-1005. https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1143010

    Bartel, C. (2020). Video games, violence, and the ethics of fantasy. Bloomsbury Publishing. http://digital.casalini.it/9781350121881

    Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of video games. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5334.001.0001

    Bouvier, P., Lavoué, E., & Sehaba, K. (2014). Defining engagement and characterizing engaged-behaviors in digital gaming. Simulation & Gaming, 45(4-5), 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114553571

    Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

    Bozkuş, O. (2021). Şiddet içerikli video oyunları ve saldırganlık ilişkisinin gözden geçirilmesi [Review of the relationship between violent video games and aggression]. Gelişim ve Psikoloji Dergisi, 2(3), 75-99. https://doi.org/10.51503/gpd.791346

    Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Brock, T. (2017). Videogame consumption: The apophatic dimension. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540516684185

    Business of Apps. (2025). Minecraft statistics. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://www.businessofapps.com/data/minecraft-statistics/

    Carissoli, C., & Villani, D. (2024). Video gaming for your well-being: What we know from 20 years of research. In D. S. Mihalits, G. Riboli, & R. G. Grgič (Eds.), Digital developments: Perspectives in psychology (pp. 53–70). IAP Information Age Publishing.

    Charles, D., & Black, M. (2004). Dynamic player modelling: A framework for player-centred digital games. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Games: Artificial Intelligence, Design and Education (pp. 29–35).

    Colman, A. M. (2003). Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(2), 139–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X03000050

    Cop, M. R., & Kablan, Z. (2018). Türkiye’de eğitsel oyunlarla ilgili yapılmış çalışmaların analizi [Analysing the studies on educational games in Türkiye]. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 1(1), 52-71.

    Cudo, A., Starzak, P., & Szubielska, M. (2024). The relationship between gaming disorder, frequency of playing action games, game context, and cognitive control. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 20, 287–295. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0438-7

    De Liu, Li, X., & Santhanam, R. (2013). Digital games and beyond: What happens when players compete? MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 111–124. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43825939

    Demir, Y. (2023). The effect of digital game addiction and self-efficacy on the academic achievement of secondary school students in social studies course: A structural equation model, E-International Journal of Educational Research, 14 (6), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1318399

    Dere, İ., & Yavuzay, M. (2020). Sosyal bilgiler derslerinde değerler eğitimine ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of teachers’ viewpoints regarding values education in social studies courses]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 56, 61-91.

    Elson, M., Breuer, J., & Quandt, T. (2014). Know thy player: An integrated model of player experience for digital games research. In M. C. Angelides & H. Agius (Eds.), Handbook of digital games, 130-142. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118796443.ch13

    Failla, C., Chilà, P., Vetrano, N., Doria, G., Scarcella, I., Minutoli, R., Scandurra, A., Gismondo, S., Marino, F., & Pioggia, G. (2024). Virtual reality for autism: Unlocking learning and growth. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1417717. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417717

    Ferreira de Souza, L. L., & Ferreira de Freitas, A. A. (2017). Consumer behavior of electronic games’ players: A study on the intentions to play and to pay. Revista de Administração, 52(4), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2017.08.004

    Flanagan, M. (2009). Critical play: Radical game design. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7678.001.0001

    Freitas, E. V. S. (2024). A socially assistive robot as a therapeutic tool for applied behavior analysis therapy in children with autism spectrum disorder through dynamically modulated serious games. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo.

    Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy? Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1, 20–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595

    Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge.

    Gee, J. P., & Gee, E. R. (2010). Women and gaming: The Sims and 21st century learning. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230106734

    Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Beacon Press, Boston.

    Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

    Koçak, T., Korkmaz, Ö. & Saltan, F. (2024). Lise öğrencilerinin dijital oyunlarla elde ettikleri 21. yüzyıl becerilerine ilişkin algı ölçeği [Perception scale of high school students’ 21st century skills acquired through digital games]. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(42), 1905-1926.

    Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

    Liazid, N., & Abdelli, O. (2025). The impact of playing electronic games on linguistic intelligence and social intelligence in children. The Algerian Journal of Security and Development, 14(1), 261–274. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/261730

    Lin, Y.-C., & Huang, P.-C. (2025). Digital traps: How technology fuels nomophobia and insomnia in Taiwanese college students. Acta Psychologica, 252(104674). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104674

    Liu, C. C. (2016). Understanding player behavior in online games: The role of gender. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.018

    Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.

    Nanjundan, P., Chinnasami, S., Saravanan, V., & Ramachandran, M. (2024). Contrasting the impact of online games and offline games: A comparative analysis. Contemporaneity of English Language and Literature in the Robotized Millennium, 2(4), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.46632/cellrm/2/4/4

    Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

    Nguyen, C. T. (2019). Games and the art of agency. The Philosophical Review, 128(4), 423-462. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-7697863

    Nieborg, D. B. (2017). App advertising: The rise of the player commodity. In J. F. Hamilton, R. Bodle, & E. Korin (Eds.), Explorations in critical studies of advertising (pp. 28–41). Routledge.

    Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. SAGE Publications.

    Poels, K., van den Hoogen, W., Ijsselsteijn, W., & de Kort, Y. (2012). Pleasure to play, arousal to stay: The effect of player emotions on digital game preferences and playing time. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0040

    Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. Sage Publications.

    Quwaider, M., Alabed, A., & Duwairi, R. (2019). The impact of video games on the players’ behaviors: A survey. Procedia Computer Science, 151, 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.077

    Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press.

    Sicart, M. (2011). Against procedurality. Game Studies, 11(3), 209.

    Sicart, M. (2013a). Moral dilemmas in computer games. Design Issues, 29(3), 28–37. The MIT Press.

    Sicart, M. (2013b). Beyond choices: The design of ethical gameplay. MIT Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/unilu-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3339668

    Statista. (2024). Fortnite active player count worldwide. Statista.

    Taylor, T. L. (2012). Raising the Stakes: E-sports and the professionalization of computer gaming. MIT Press.

    Tonga, İ. (2024). Dijital oyun bağımlılığı ve okul bağlılığı arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between digital game addiction and school engagement]. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(21), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.29129/inujgse.1294209

    Ülker, Ü., & Bülbül, H. İ. (2018). Dijital oyunların eğitim seviyelerine göre kullanılma durumları [Use of digital games according to education levels]. TÜBAV Bilim Dergisi, 11(2), 10-19.

    Verbeek, P.-P. (2006). Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(3), 361-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243905285847

    Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Whitson, J. R. (2013). Game design by numbers: Instrumental play and the quantitative shift in the digital game ındustry. Carleton University Repository.

    Yang, J. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2020). An investigation of game behavior in the context of digital game-based learning: An individual difference perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106432

    Yiğit Açıkgöz, F., & Yalman, A. (2018). Dijital oyunların çocukların kişilik ve davranışları üzerinde etkisi: Gta 5 oyunu örneği [The effect of digital games on children’s personality and behaviour: The example of Gta 5 game]. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi (29. Özel Sayısı), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.454283

    Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Press.

    Zhang, J. (2010). Reflexive theory-of-mind reasoning in games: From empirical evidence to modeling. In Proceedings of the Behavioral and Quantitative Game Theory: Conference on Future Directions (BQGT ‘10) (Article 29, p. 1). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1807406.1807435

    Digital Games Analyzed in Research

    Activision. (2025). Call of Duty. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://www.callofduty.com

    Blizzard Entertainment. (2025). Overwatch. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://playoverwatch.com/tr-tr/

    Epic Games. (2025). Fortnite. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://www.epicgames.com/fortnite/tr/home

    Mojang Studios. (2025). Minecraft. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://www.minecraft.net/tr-tr

    PUBG Corporation. (2025). PUBG (PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds). Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://www.pubg.com

    Riot Games. (2025). League of Legends. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://www.leagueoflegends.com/tr-tr/

    Riot Games. (2025). Valorant. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://playvalorant.com/tr-tr/

    Roblox Corporation. (2025). Roblox. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://www.roblox.com

    Supercell. (2025). Brawl Stars. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://supercell.com/en/games/brawlstars/

    Supercell. (2025). Clash of Clans. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://supercell.com/en/games/clashofclans/