Research article    |    Open Access
Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education 2026, Vol. 7(2) 49-66

A qualitative study on the leadership experiences of female principals in educational institutions

Merve Cebeci, Abdurrahman İlğan

pp. 49 - 66

Publish Date: September 30, 2026  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0


Abstract

This study aims to analyze the leadership experiences of female principals in the education sector, the gender-based challenges they encounter, the strategies they adopt, and their impact on institutions within a qualitative framework. The study group consisted of 16 female principals from the Konak and Narlıdere districts of Izmir, selected through purposive sampling. The data were analyzed using inductive content analysis, through which codes were systematically generated and grouped into themes. The findings reveal that female principals are exposed to gender-based prejudices from their male colleagues and subordinates. Their leadership competencies are questioned, and their ideas are inadequately supported or ignored. Female principals contribute a democratic climate, innovative perspectives, nurturing communication (especially with children), detail-oriented management, and a sense of ownership to their institutions; they provide social visibility as role models in disadvantaged areas and emphasize gender equality in all areas of life. They adopt egalitarian policies and establish effective interaction with female parents and female students. While being single offers an advantage in time management, spousal support is of vital importance for married individuals. It is recommended that the number of female principals be increased in the future and that administrative authority be expanded in economically disadvantaged regions.

Keywords: Leadership, Woman, Woman leadership, Woman principal


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Cebeci, M., & Ilgan, A. (2026). A qualitative study on the leadership experiences of female principals in educational institutions. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 7(2), 49-66.

Harvard
Cebeci, M. and Ilgan, A. (2026). A qualitative study on the leadership experiences of female principals in educational institutions. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 7(2), pp. 49-66.

Chicago 16th edition
Cebeci, Merve and Abdurrahman Ilgan (2026). "A qualitative study on the leadership experiences of female principals in educational institutions". Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education 7 (2):49-66.

References

    Akbaba Altun, S., & Turan Bora, H. (2025). Fostering students’ sense of school belonging: Emotional intelligence and socio-ecological perspectives. Journal of Intelligence, 13(9), Article 112. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-3200/13/9/112

    Alban Conto, C., Guilbert, N., Devignes, F., & Barón, J. D. (2023). When she leads: How female principals guide and impact Sub-Saharan Africa’s classrooms. UNESCO-IIEP Dakar & World Bank. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/africacan/when-she-leads-how-female-principals-guide-and-impact-sub-saharan-africas-classrooms

    Baker, D. P. (2025). Women’s representation in management positions: Global trends and implications. Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12611

    Bergmann, J., Alban Conto, C. and Brossard, M., (2022). Increasing Women’s Representation in School Leadership: A promising path towards improving learning. UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti, Florence

    Blackmore, J. (1999). Troubling women: Feminism, leadership and educational change. Open University Press.

    Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business Press.

    Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00238

    Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569

    Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573

    Education Resource Strategies. (2023). Family-friendly policies for school leaders: Impact on retention. https://www.erstrategies.org/library/family-friendly-policies-school-leaders

    Fryer, R. G. (2011). Teacher incentives and student achievement: Evidence from New York City public schools (NBER Working Paper No. 16850). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w16850

    Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. Jossey-Bass.

    Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.

    Gregorio, M.-A. C. (2025). Relationship of emotional intelligence (EI) and administrative performance of private school principals: Basis for EI training program. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(7), 4995–5049. https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/relationship-of-emotional-intelligence-ei-and-administrative-performance-of-private-school-principals-basis-for-ei-training-program/

    Grogan, M., & Shakeshaft, C. (2011). Women and educational leadership. Jossey-Bass.

    Guilbert, N., Alban Conto, C., Devignes, F., & Barón, J. D. (2024). When she leads: How female principals guide and impact Sub-Saharan Africa’s classrooms. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/africacan/when-she-leads-how-female-principals-guide-and-impact-sub-saharan-africas-classrooms

    Hamilton, L. S., Engberg, J., Steiner, E. D., Nelson, C. A., & Yuan, K. (2012). Improving school leadership through support, evaluation, and incentives: The Pittsburgh Principal Incentive Program (MG-1223-PPS). RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1223.html

    Harris, A., Ismail, N., Jones, M., Azorín, C., & Longville, J. (2024). Invisible leaders: Reviewing contemporary evidence about women leaders in education. School Leadership & Management, 44(5), 523-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2024.2408220

    Hsu, N., Newman, D. A., & Badura, K. L. (2022). Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership: Meta-Analysis and Explanatory Model of Female Leadership Advantage. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040104.

    İlğan, A. (2007). Carl Glickman’ın gelişimsel denetim modeli [Carl Glickman’s developmental supervision model]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(14), 1–15.

    İlğan, A., Aktan, O., & Üztemur, S. (2022). Focusing on sustainable development of teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 13(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2022-0003

    Grant-Vallone, E. J., & Ensher, E. A. (2011). Opting In Between: Strategies Used by Professional Women With Children to Balance Work and Family: Strategies Used by Professional Women With Children to Balance Work and Family. Journal of Career Development, 38(4), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845310372219

    Kossek, E. E., Ollier-Malaterre, A., & Lee, M. D. (2022). Coworker reactions to work-life balance initiatives: Implications for women leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 65(4), 1234–1256.

    Kossek, E. E., Su, R., & Wu, L. (2022). “Opting in” between work and family: Career and motherhood choices. Academy of Management Journal.

    Latorre, C., Serrano-Pintado, I., & Bonilla-Quintero, A. I. (2025). Transformational leadership and managerial barriers for women: A cross-cultural study. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08127-w

    Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

    Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/How-Leadership-Influences-Student-Learning.pdf

    Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436268

    Martínez, M. M., Molina-López, M. M., & de Cabo, R. M. (2021). Explaining the gender gap in school principalship: A tale of two sides. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(6), 863-882. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220918258

    Massouti, A., Shaya, N., Qareiny, S. M. A. (2024). Exploring the nexus between female school leaders’ perceptions of distributed instructional leadership, socio-cultural dynamics, and student achievement in the Arab world. International Journal of Educational Research Open 7, 100372. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000542

    Ndlovu, T. (2023). Leadership challenges facing female school principals in the Durban ink area. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/93853943/Leadership_challenges_facing_female_school_principals_in_the_Durban_ink_area

    Outtrim, M. (2025). Empowering women in educational leadership: Experiences of female principals. In Women and empowerment (pp. 77–90). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-2759-2_7

    Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Walker, L. S., & Woehr, D. J. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1129–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036751

    Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in educational administration (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.

    Singh, S., Miah, S., & Ali, M. (2023). Emotional intelligence and career advancement of women leaders. European Management Journal.

    Spyropoulos, N., Antonopoulou, H., Rafailidis, A., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2026). Leadership under pressure: Professional burnout and gender differences among secondary school principals. Administrative Sciences, 16(2), Article 72. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/16/2/72

    Teaching Profession Playbook. (2024). Principal incentive programs: Lessons from high-performing districts. Avaliable at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5f4048bbd7dba74d40ec9c46/t/608edfd555f6f13a4cecb5e9/1619976159553/Teaching+Profession+Playbook+-+Partnership+for+the+Future+of+Learning+-+050121.pdf

    Tok, T. N., & Yalçın, S. (2017). Kadın okul müdürlerinin liderlik özellikleri [Leadership characteristics of female school principals]. Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 23(2), 245–267.

    Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2022). Türkiye’de cinsiyet istatistikleri 2022 [Gender statistics in Türkiye 2022]. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Cinsiyet-Istatistikleri-2022-49699

    Üztemur, S., İlğan, A., & Sevigen, E. (2022). Teaching at private schools: A phenomenological study on ethical dilemmas. Journal of Pedagogy, 13(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.2478/jped-2022-0003

    Vecchio, R. P. (2002). Leadership and gender advantage. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 643–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00156-X

    Wang, L. (2022). Exploring the relationship among teacher emotional intelligence, work engagement, teacher self-efficacy, and student academic achievement: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 810559. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8761667/

    World Economic Forum. (2020). Global gender gap report 2020.

    Zenger, J., & Folkman, J. (2019, June 25). Research: Women score higher than men in most leadership skills. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/06/research-women-score-higher-than-men-in-most-leadership-skills

    Zenger, J., & Folkman, J. (2020, December 30). Research: Women are better leaders during a crisis. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/12/research-women-are-better-leaders-during-a-crisis