Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: the heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9114-6

Aras, B. (2020). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin inovatif (yenilikçi) düşünme düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (Afyonkarahisar il örneklemi) [Investigation of secondary school student’s innovative thinking levels in terms of various variables (Afyonkarahisar sampling)]. (Master’s thesis), Afyonkarahisar University, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/  Access Date: 05/04/2023

Aydın Gürler, S. (2022). State of prediction of the critical thinking dispositions of primary school teacher candidates through their self-efficacy for STEM practices. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 9(3), 61-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.22.54.9.3

Aydın, G., Saka, M., & Guzey, S. (2017). 4-8. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen, teknoloji, mühendislik, matematik (STEM= FETEMM) tutumlarının incelenmesi [Science, technology, engineering, mathematic (STEM) attitude levels in grades 4th-8 th]. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(2), 787-802. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.290319

Bakırcı, H., & Kaplan, Y. (2021). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin mühendislik ve tasarım becerileri alanında karşılaştığı sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri [Encountered problems by science teachers in the field of engineering and design skills and suggestions for solutions]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9(18), 626-654. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.908161

Balçın, M. D., Çavuş, R., & Yavuz Topaloğlu, M. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin FeTeMM’e yönelik tutumlarının ve FeTeMM alanlarındaki mesleklere yönelik ilgilerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of secondary school students’ attitudes towards STEM and their interest towards professions in STEM fields]. Asian Journal of Instruction, 6(2), 40-62.

Barak, M., Morad, S., & Ragonis, N. (2013). Students’ innovative thinking and their perceptions about the ideal learning environment. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations, 111–125.

Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Benek, İ. (2019). Sosyobilimsel STEM etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin tutumlarına ve 21. yüzyıl becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi [Examination of the effect of socioscientific STEM’s activities on students’ attitudes and 21st centry skills]. (Doctoral dissertation), İstanbul University, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/  Access Date: 05/04/2023

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods (11th ed.)]. Ankara: Pegem.

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ898909 Access Date: 01/04/2023

Can, A. (2019). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in scientific research process with SPSS (11th Edt.). Ankara: Pegem.

Canbazoğlu, H. B., & Tümkaya, S. (2020). İlkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin fen, teknoloji, mühendislik, matematik (FeTeMM) tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) attitudes of fourth grade primary school students in terms of various variables]. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 188-209. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.655216

Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of hands-on STEM engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 898-909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9572-6

Çatalbaş, E. (2006). Lise öğrencilerinin düşünme stillerinin akademik başarı ve ders tutumları arasındaki ilişki [The relation between academic success and lesson manner of thinking style of highs school students] (Master’s thesis), Selçuk University, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/  Access Date: 05/04/2023

Dennis, A. & Hamm, M. (2010). Demystify math, science, and technology: Creativity, innovation, and problem solving. United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Deveci, İ. (2018). Fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının sahip oldukları FeTeMM farkındalıklarının girişimci özellikleri yordama durumu [The STEM awareness as predictor of entrepreneurial characteristics of prospective science teachers]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(4), 1247-1256. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.356829

Deveci, İ., & Kavak, S. (2020). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin yenilikçilik algıları ve yenilikçi düşünme eğilimleri: Bir keşfedici ardışık desen [Innovativeness perceptions and innovative thinking tendencies of middle school students: An exploratory sequential design]. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 346-378. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.15m

Deveci, İ., & Konuş, F. Z. (2022). The predictive power of Turkish middle school students’ entrepreneurial competencies on STEM attitudes. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 31(2), 425-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557221097178

Durucu, A. S., & Başaran, M. (2022). Investigation of the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy in inquiry-based teaching for STEM+S and teaching 21st-Century skills. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 3(3), 339-362. https://doi.org/10.29329/jirte.2022.479.6

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd Edt.). London: SAGE Publications.

Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Gottfredson’s theory of circum scription, compromise and selfcreation. In D. Brown & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp.101-106). Bensenville: Scholastic Testing Service.

Grégoire, J. (2018). Creativity and innovation: Skills for the 21st century. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 35(3), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000300001

Hubbard, K., Embry-Jenlink, K., & Beverly, L. (2015). A university approach to improving STEM teacher recruitment and retention. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 51(2), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2015.1023139

Hutchison, L. F. (2012). Addressing the STEM teacher shortage in American schools: Ways to recruit and retain effective STEM teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 34(5-6), 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2012.729483

Jacobson, M. J., & Kozma, R. B. (Eds.) (2000). Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602671

Kaufman, K. J. (2013). 21 ways to 21st Century skills: why students need them and ideas for practical implementation. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 49(2), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2013.786594

Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2013). Impact of environmental power monitoring activities on middle school student perceptions of STEM. Science Education International, 24(1), 98-123. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1015828.pdf                  Access Date: 01/04/2023

Lantz, H. B. (2009). What should be the function of a K-12 STEM education? SEEN, 11(3), 29-30.

Lazowska E. (2011). STEM education in Washington: The facts of the matter. Retrieved from https://lazowska.cs.washington.edu/STEM.pdf Access Date: 02/04/2023

Lodico, M., Spaulding, D., & Voegtle, K. (2010). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice (2nd Edt.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Ma, Y., Zhang, S., & Liu, Y. (2018). On the cultivation of college students' sci-tech innovation ability in the new era. International Conference on Humanities and Advanced Education Technology, 34-37. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.12783/dtssehs/ichae2018/25624 Access Date: 02/04/2023

Mehalik, M. M, Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted ınquiry: better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00955.x

Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı [Science curriculum (Primary and secondary school grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8)]. Ankara: Ministry of National Education Board of Education and Instruction.

Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2021). Okul öncesinden ortaöğretime farklı disiplinlerde STEM eğitimi uygulamaları [STEM education practices in different disciplines from pre-school to secondary education]. Ministry of National Education General Directorate of Innovation and Educational Technologies. Retrieved from Okul-oncesinden-ortaogretime-farkli-disiplinlerde-stem-eğitimi-uygulamalari_final.pdf (eba.gov.tr) Access Date: 02/04/2023

Morrison, J. S. (2006). Attributes of STEM education: The students, the academy, the classroom. TIES STEM Education Monograph Series. Baltimore: Teaching Institute for Excellence in STEM.

Muradoğlu, B. (2020). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin fen bilimleri derslerindeki yenilikçilik algıları ve göstergeleri [Secondary school students' perceptions and indicators of innovativeness in science courses]. (Master’s thesis), Trabzon University, Turkey. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ Access Date: 05/04/2023

Özcan, H., & Koca, E. (2018). STEM’e yönelik tutum ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Turkish adaptation of the attitude towards STEM scale: A validity and reliability study]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018045061

Özcan, H., & Koştur, H. İ. (2019). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı kazanımlarının özel amaçlar ve alana özgü beceriler bakımından incelenmesi [The investigations of science curriculum acquisitions in terms of special purposes and field-specific skills]. Trakya Journal of Education, 9(1), 138-151. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.469584

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS program (6th ed.). London, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2008). 21st century skills, education & competitiveness: A resource and policy guide. Washington DC.

Rábanos, N. L., & Torres, P. A. (2012). Effects of a program for developing creative thinking skills. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(3), 1139-1158. Retrieved from www.investigacion-psicopedagogica.org/revista/new/english(ContadorArticulo.php?793 Access Date: 02/04/2023

Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(8), 1-4. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:57015149 Access Date: 03/04/2023

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation (4th edition). New York: The Free Press.

Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. Technology Teacher, 68 (4), 20-26. Retrieved from https://www.teachmeteamwork.com/files/sanders.istem.ed.ttt.istem.ed.def.pdf Access Date: 03/04/2023

Sanders, M. E., (2012). Integrative STEM education as “best practice”. Paper presented at 7th Biennial International Technology Education Research Conference (Queensland, Australia).

Saraç, E., & Yıldırım, M. S. (2019). 2018 fen bilimleri öğretim programına yönelik öğretmen görüşleri. [Teachers’ views on science course curriculum of the year 2018]. Academy Journal of Educational Sciences 3(2), 138-151. https://doi.org/10.31805/acjes.641002

Sarı, U., & Yazıcı, Y. Y. (2019). Fen bilgisi öğretmenlerinin fen ve mühendislik uygulamaları hakkında görüşleri [Science teachers' opinions on science and engineering applications]. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 5(2), 157-167. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.519447

Savaş, Ö., & Şeker, P. T. (2022). The effect of STEM training practices developed for children on scientific process skills. Journal of Innovative Research in Teacher Education, 3(2), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.29329/jirte.2022.464.3

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th Edt.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Van De Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2014). İlkokul ve ortaokul matematiği gelişimsel yaklaşımla öğretim [Teaching primary and secondary school mathematics with developmental approach] (Trans.: Soner Durmuş). Ankara: Nobel.

Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636

Wheeler, J. (1998). The power of innovative thinking: let new ideas lead you to success. United States of America: National Press Publications.

Yetkin, N., & Aküzüm, C. (2022). İlkokul dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinin öğrenme anlayışları ve STEM eğitimine yönelik tutumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationship between primary school 4th grade students’ conceptions of learning and attitudes towards STEM education]. Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches, 11(1), 744-769. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.951520

Yiğit, N., Muradoğlu, B., & Mazlum Güven, E. (2019). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin yenilikçi düşünme algılarına yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması [Secondary School Students’ Perceptions of Innovative Thinking: A Scale Development Study]. Paper presented at the International Conference on Science, Mathematics, Entrepreneurship and Technology Education (İzmir).

Yorulmaz, A., Çokçalışkan, H., & Çelik, Ö. (2017). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının matematiksel düşünmeleri ile bireysel yenilikçilikleri arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi [Identifying the relationship between individual innovation with mathematical thinking of pre-service primary school teachers]. Trakya University Journal of Education Faculty, 8(2), 304-317. https://doi.org/10.24315/trkefd.321973

Yücel, A. G., Çiftçi, B., & Durmaz, A. (2022). Yaratıcı düşünmenin sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programından çıkarılması: Yenilikçi düşünme yeterli mi? [Removing creative thinking from the social studies curriculum: Is innovative thinking enough?] Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Journal of ISS, 12(1), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1064873